Supervised autonomy · Authorized offensive security

Pen testing that runs at machine speed, under your control.

Z7 Claw Force runs scope-bound external penetration tests. Every intrusive action passes an enforced scope guard and a human-approval gate before it dispatches, and the entire timeline is sealed in an append-only audit trail.

Live engagement, simulated

Watch Force work a scope, and stop at the gate.

This is how an engagement actually runs: authorization first, recon inside the scope, and a hard stop for human approval before anything intrusive fires. Nothing here touches a real target.

force-engine · engagement #----
live
01
Authorization
RoE + scope verified
02
Recon
in-scope assets only
03
Attack surface
services fingerprinted
04
Validation
candidates triaged
05
Controlled exploit
human-gated
06
Report
evidence sealed
Human gate
Intrusive actions wait here for an operator decision.
100%
Actions inside the agreed scope
0
Out-of-scope actions, by design
100%
Intrusive steps human-approved
100%
Timeline in the audit trail
Why supervised autonomy

Adversary speed, with a leash you hold.

Scope guard

Only what you authorize

Targets you list are in scope. Anything outside the agreed scope is rejected before it runs, not tested and apologized for later.

Human gate

Approval before impact

Every intrusive action queues for a human decision. Nothing high-risk dispatches unattended, and each approval is recorded with who and when.

Audit trail

Defensible by record

Authorization, scope decisions, approvals, and actions are hash-chained into an append-only log that becomes the backbone of the report.

Ready to put a target in scope?

Start with a Rules-of-Engagement intake. We confirm authorization and scope before a single packet leaves the lab.